On Tuesday, Czech President Václav Klaus
swore in the new conservative government, formed following the May
Parliamentary elections, in which the left-wing Social Democrats won by a narrow
margin, but center-right parties captured more votes overall. The right-wing
coalition secured 118 of the Parliament’s 200 lower-chamber seats. All fifteen
Minister posts will be held by men, a choice which has been criticized by
political analysts and women’s rights groups alike. However, the Parliament now
houses a record number of women, 22% of the MPs, and will be led by women.
Ethnic minorities, who make up no more than 3 percent of the total population,
on the other hand, have no representation in Parliament.
Those on the margins of Czech society have a reason to worry. One of the
right-leaning government’s highest
priorities is placing limits on government spending, namely by cutting
government jobs and salaries as well as slashing social expenditures and
overhauling (read eventually privatizing) the pension and health care systems.
The trend of reducing government spending, especially child and maternity
benefits as well as support for the unemployed, is troubling for those already
struggling to survive.
“The new right-wing government will cause more intense isolation of the Roma
on the margins of society,” constituted Romani activist Štefan Gorol, one of the
respondents to a post-election
survey carried
out by Romano hangos, a Romani monthly. “We will be denied access to resources
which are available to other members of the society. These resources include
employment, housing, social protection, health care, and education.”
Mr. Gorol is not alone. Ivan Veselý, chairman of the Romani advocacy and
media group Dženo Association, is one of many who are concerned.
“The times are getting tough. There are going to be serious ramifications,”
says Veselý.
Respekt weekly editor-in-chief Erik Tabery in his political commentary on the
new government
agrees that slashing social benefits is a terrible idea: “It’s difficult to
understand that the administration is apparently preparing to cut social
benefits for poor families with children or support for people with a lighter
form of disabilities. However much it may be necessary to prevent the abuse of
various benefits, this type of support should not be abolished. A state that is
not able to take care of the most vulnerable is worthless.”
Something important to remember is that not all people living in poverty in
the Czech Republic are Roma, as the mainstream press would have the public
believe.
“Only about one-fifth of those on social welfare benefits are Roma,” Veselý
points out. This is still a disproportionately high number, considering the Roma
make up around 2% of the total population (the number of Roma living in the
Czech Republic is estimated to be somewhere between 150,000 and 300,000.)
At least half the Romani population do not live below the poverty level in
socially excluded locations (sociologist Ivan Gabal estimates the number of Roma
in socially excluded locations to be just over 85 thousand of the total of
150,000 to 200,000 Roma in the country) and many are college-educated
professionals. Karel Holomek, long-time Romani activist and current president of
the international Decade for Roma Inclusion 2005-2015, stresses just that in his
latest
blog post entitled “Absence of Rationality in Discussions about the Peaceful
Co-existence of the Roma in Our Society“:
Such discussions point at a deficiency of the members of the Romani
community, which they inaccurately call inadaptibility. What is talked about is
careless attitude toward housing (on the part of the Roma), non-payment of rent,
aggressive behavior of Romani children, unwillingness to learn or work, abuse of
social benefits and other such matters. . . An unfortunate consequence is that
the nature of this type of a discussion and, in general, such commonly and
almost uniformly held societal views have a negative effect not only on a
relatively small group of Roma, but on the entire society. . . The public’s
hatred expressed quite clearly in statistical data is aimed against the entire
Romani community, even though it is clear that it should only concern the part
which is discreditable, if we at all accept such discredibility exists. And this
group is much smaller than the entire Romani community.
The government’s focus on cutting spending is driven by the Maastricht
Treaty, which mandates all EU member states to cut their state spending to a
threshold of 3%. Currently the public deficit for the Czech Republic is
projected to be 5.6% of GDP for 2010. Of course, the recession is another reason
for the cuts, the public is told.
While the media work the public opinion by highlighting random Romani
families who find loopholes in the social benefit system to “take advantage of,”
and airing heated debates with guests who spout racist stereotypes and point
fingers at the Roma as the “culprits for all the social ills,” the government
wheels and deals, bringing in record profits despite the recession, yet warning
of drastic cuts to social spending.
Some questions have recently been raised about the Czech government’s finance
priorities in the form of backroom deals from which the country’s largest energy
provider, the state-run energy company and highest grossing Czech company ČEZ,
stands to profit.
In 2009, ČEZ, the largest Czech corporation, earned a
record profit of 196 billion crowns marking a growth in earnings despite the
recession. The company, of which 69.4% is owned by the Czech government with the
rest in private hands, is being questioned about its role in
influencing policy as well as the outcome of the elections by placing its
key
allies and board members in ministry positions. It is also under pressure to
explain its inflated expenditure (paid for by taxpayer money) for the
construction of new power plants. The Ecological Law Service
puts
the excess at 30 billion crowns above market value.
In contrast, the latest
estimate is that cuts in social benefit spending could save the Czech
government about 11 billion crowns.
Jaroslav Spurný, assistant editor of the weekly Respekt pertinently
writes:
“The amount at which the Ecological Law Service arrived showed that the
three Czech brown coal power plants are overpriced by 30 billion crowns. We are
witnessing either enormous waste or enormous theft. If it is true and the
government doesn’t respond, we can forget about the reforms. They will be good
for nothing, because what the state shaves off from social benefits, will be
easily spent by ČEZ.“